Services
Overview Cybersecurity solutions Penetration testing SOC Digital forensics & incident response Audit & Advisory GRC Security awareness & training Social engineering IT staffing & placement
Partners
Overview Fortinet Palo Alto Networks WALLIX Netskope Rapid7 Tenable Proofpoint Netwrix Illumio Claroty Microsoft Tufin
Use cases
Overview Infrastructure & network Unified secure network Industrial infrastructure Wi-Fi network Zero Trust access (ZTNA) Cloud & identity Microsoft 365 / Azure migration Privileged access (PAM) Active Directory Corporate email Detection & response Detection capability (SOC) Responding to a compromise Vulnerability management Compliance & resilience Preparing for ISO 27001 ICT Minimum Standard DORA regulation Business continuity (BCP/DRP) Human factor Reducing human risk
Clients
Company
About Certifications Careers CSR commitments
Contact
FRENDE
Technology partner

Tenable integrator in Switzerland

We deploy and operate Tenable One — vulnerability and web application analysis on a single platform, with prioritisation that accounts for the real context.

Why this vendor

Tenable built its reputation on detection quality. That criterion counts for more than it seems: an engine producing too many false positives wears the remediation teams out within a few cycles, and a programme whose results are no longer believed stops of its own accord, whatever the tool.

The Tenable One platform gathers these analyses under a single prioritisation. The point is to reason on one ranking rather than three separate lists — infrastructure, web applications, cloud — that nobody knows how to reconcile. An organisation can only arbitrate on a single queue.

Our contribution is the design of the programme: which assets are in scope, which prioritisation criteria, which deadlines per severity level, and how to produce evidence an auditor will accept. The tool deploys in a few days; those answers take work with your teams.

Our offensive practice serves that reading directly: between a theoretical score and real exploitability in your architecture, the gap is often considerable.

Tenable
What we bring
  • Design of the programme and its criteria
  • Prioritisation by real exploitability
  • Analysis of exposed web applications
  • Evidence usable in an ISO 27001 audit
  • Deadline tracking and measured debt
Vendor website
Diagram

One platform, two scopes

Tenable One architecture: exposure management platform InfrastructureVulnerability ManagementWeb applicationsWeb App ScanningTenable Onea single prioritisationTenable One
A single prioritisation rather than two separate lists: that is the condition for an organisation to be able to arbitrate at all.

The products we integrate

Two scopes of analysis under a common platform, and a single prioritisation queue.

Infrastructure vulnerabilities

Tenable One Vulnerability Management covers servers, workstations, network equipment and cloud environments. Detection is fine-grained, with or without an agent depending on the context. The settings matter as much as the tool: a badly chosen scan window or missing authentication credentials produce a partial picture that gives a false sense of control.

Tenable One Vulnerability Management

Exposed web applications

Tenable One Web App Scanning analyses web applications, which largely escape infrastructure scanning. It is a complement, not a substitute for an application penetration test: the automated tool covers the known and the repetitive, the human finds the business logic flaws no tool knows how to formulate.

Tenable One Web App Scanning
The platform

Tenable One brings these analyses under a common prioritisation that crosses technical severity with the asset's context. That is what allows a single queue to be presented to the remediation teams — and an organisation can only arbitrate on a single queue.

Tenable One
Our approach

How we proceed

The cycle matters more than the tool. What separates a programme from a scan is that it closes its loop and measures itself.

Vulnerability management cycle 01Scope andcriteria02Continuousdetection03Prioritisation04Remediation05VerificationContinuous cycle
Verification closes the cycle: without it, nothing proves that an announced fix actually happened.
Related use cases

This service in practice

Vulnerabilities
Managing vulnerabilities continuously
Compliance & governance
Preparing for ISO 27001
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

The design of the programme and the reading of its results. Our offensive practice lets us judge whether a vulnerability is genuinely reachable in your architecture — between a high score and real exploitability the gap is often considerable, and it is the gap that should govern the order of work.

No, and it does not claim to. The automated tool covers broadly and repeats tirelessly; it finds known flaws and weak configurations. A business logic flaw — an access control you can bypass by changing an identifier in a request — needs a human who understands what the application is for.

Yes, provided the programme is documented. An ISO 27001 auditor does not ask for a scan report: they ask for the scope covered, the prioritisation criteria, the deadlines defined, and the evidence that they are met. We build that documentation alongside the programme, not afterwards.

Yes, through our support and managed service offering: running the cycles, qualifying results, tracking deadlines and producing the executive indicators. Or through a handover to your teams.

A scan, or a programme?

Describe your context — the difference is decided on the criteria, not on the tool.

Contact us